Dekret między Chaimem, arendarzem mołomolińskim, a Panem Turskim, podstarościm redwińskim, o kradzież żyta = Decree between Chaim, the leaseholder of Mołomolińce and Antoni Turski, the vicecapitaneus of Redwińce on the theft of rye

Article

In basket

Dekret między Chaimem, arendarzem mołomolińskim, a Panem Turskim, podstarościm redwińskim, o kradzież żyta = Decree between Chaim, the leaseholder of Mołomolińce and Antoni Turski, the vicecapitaneus of Redwińce on the theft of rye / [wybór, opracowanie i przypisy] Emilia Hruszowiec. W: Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka. R. 78, nr 3 (2023), s. 115-130.

Author

Hruszowiec Emilia Opracowanie

Form of Work

Artykuły Publikacje naukowe

Subject

Todorowicz, Chaim Turski, Antoni Sądownictwo Własność wielka Żydzi Międzybóż (Ukraina, obw. chmielnicki, rej. chmielnicki)

Genre/Form

Artykuł z czasopisma historycznego Wydawnictwo źródłowe Artykuł z czasopisma naukowego

Domain

Prawo i wymiar sprawiedliwości Historia

Okres

d1726

Dokument nadrzędny: Śląski Kwartalnik Historyczny Sobótka. R. 78, nr 3 (2023) / [redaktor naczelny Tomasz Przerwa] ; Wrocławskie Towarzystwo Miłośników Historii. Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwa Historycznego.

Dokument z 1726 r.

Summary: Trial records are an indispensable source of information regarding the judicia-ry and the phenomenon of crime in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Mentioned documents also remain an indirect trace of the then social relations. The presented de-cree, which records the course of the investigation between the leaseholders of the Sie-niawski-Czartoryski estates, is undoubtedly apart of described issue. Additionally, the situation is distinguished by the fact that its main figures were the representatives of two various communities of nobility and of the Jewish community. The direct cause of the prosecution was an erroneous accusation against the Jew of arye theft, and arising law-lessness on the part of the nobleman. Despite the fact that Turski revealed the real per-petrator of the crime and pleaded guilty, similar cases were not rare. The leasehold was considered as aprofitable occupation; hence, the competition that arose in this field was aconstant source of various conflicts, both social and religious, in which the anti-Jewish sentiment may have played avital role as well. Nowonder that also in this case the role of the scapegoat was assigned to one of representatives of the Jewish faith.

Wersja elektroniczna

Notes:

Summary, etc.

Dokument z 1726 r.

Language note

Streszczenie w języku angielskim.